Forms
~ Cover
Page
~ Budget
Form
Description
Regardless
of the professional field you pursue
post-graduation, whether in academia, non-profit research, industry,
land
management, environmental education, or government, you may have to
write or
critique a number of grant proposals. The
purpose of this exercise is to give you some
experience in this
realm and to continue to improve your writing skills.
In order to write a successful grant
application, it will be necessary to conduct a thorough search of the
literature, which should further your ornithological education (and
this, of
course, is critical … to me). At the end
of the semester you will be required to give an 8-minute “pitch” of
your idea
to the class. Your ability to convey and
argue ideas both on paper and orally will likely play a large role in
your
vocational success regardless of the specific field.
You will be
expected to develop a research question
concerning any aspect of ornithology. Basically,
this means you can develop any question
that uses birds as
the primary study organism in the fields of ecology, physiology,
demography,
conservation biology, ethology, endocrinology, developmental biology,
biogeography, genetics, comparative biology, neurology, or some other
related
field. Questions that incorporate other
groups of organisms are acceptable, but it must have a strong avian
component. You are then expected to
design an experiment or observational/correlative study with proper
controls
and tests to answer the question. You are welcomed to use research
questions
that you may already be pursuing as part of an undergraduate thesis or
independent
study. You will then write a grant to an
organization of your choice. You may
make up an organization if you’d like. You
will be required to provide the mission
statement of the
organization you choose so that your proposal can be evaluated for
‘fit’. I haven’t specified an organization
because I
do not want to limit your question to one that has
conservation/theoretical/management/educational application.
The proposal must conform
to the following format:
| Section |
Length Maximum |
Deadline |
Grade |
| Cover
Page |
1 page |
Jan 23rd |
Completion
Grade |
| Objectives |
250 words |
Feb 2nd |
Completion
Grade |
| Project
Abstract |
250 words |
March 16th |
. |
| Project
Description |
5 pages |
March 16th |
. |
| Methods
& Analysis |
2 pages |
March 16th |
. |
| Justification
& Impact |
500 words |
March 16th |
. |
| Budget |
1 page |
March 16th |
. |
| Literature
Cited |
as needed |
March 16th |
. |
| Resume |
2 pages |
March 16th |
. |
| Complete
1st Draft |
~ |
March 16th |
40% of
Project Grade |
| Complete
Final Draft |
~ |
April 23rd |
60% of
Project Grade |
All
components should be written using
Microsoft-Word-compatible software. Text
should be in twelve-point, Times New Roman font, single-spaced, with 1”
margins
on all sides. All submissions should be
e-mailed directly to me at olsen@vt.edu by 5pm
on the day indicated. The final grade
will be an average of the two drafts. If
you are satisfied with the grade you received on the first draft, you
do not
have to submit a second draft. Each
section should meet the requirements listed below:
Cover Page
The form for
the cover page can be found on the website and
should include the following information: project
title, granting agency, granting agency’s
mission statement,
principal investigator’s (PI’s - you) name, co-PI’s names (if any),
mailing
address, e-mail, institutional affiliation (Dept and VA Tech), start
and end
dates of study (if project includes both laboratory and field work
please
indicate dates for both), amount requested from agency, study species,
and
field site(s) (if any).
Project Abstract
The abstract
should provide a third person summation of the
objectives, justification, and description of the project with a
minimum of
scientific jargon. Consider this as the
sound-byte that can be fed to legislators (if a federal/state agency)
or
members (if a non-profit organization) to explain where their tax
dollars/membership dues went. You don’t
want to be labeled as pork barrel!
Project Description
This is the
meat of the proposal. You should describe
the scientific
justifications for your study plus a background description of similar
or
related work done to date. Why are your
objectives important? How will your
objectives answer the problem you address? How
will your work advance the field? Why is
this study the next logical step in its field?
Objectives
This should
be a concise description of what specific
research goals you expect to meet. Do
not include goals to which your project can be applied or goals that
your
project helps reach. List or narrative
formats are both acceptable.
Methods &
Analysis
Describe the
methodology in detail. Where will the
study be conducted? How will the study be
designed? How will it be executed? What proper controls will be
implemented? Justify how your
methodology will help answer your research question and meet your
research
objectives. Why weren’t alternative
methodologies used? What type of data
will you gather? How will you analyze it
(generally, I don’t need in depth descriptions of statistics here)?
Justification &
Expected Impact
Why is your
research question of interest to your funding
agency? How does it advance the goals of
your agency? How will the outcome of
your project impact the area your agency is concerned with and the
scientific
community in general? What further
research questions or policy questions will be addressable after the
completion
of this study?
Budget
The budget
should follow the form and
include no more than one additional page of justification (described in
more
detail on the form).
Literature Cited
You should
have a minimum of 15 sources. Unless the
nature of your project justifies
otherwise (speak to me if you have questions), all sources should be
from
peer-reviewed journals, theses/dissertations, or official agency
reports. See me if you encounter problems
in your
literature search. Citations should
follow the format in the Auk. See
section IV of the Auk’s “instructions to authors” for more details
(http://www.aou.org/auk/authors.php3). In-text
citations should follow the format listed in
section I.
Résumé
The
résumé should be tailored to show your relevant
experience to this project (loosely defined). Write
it as though you are applying for a job to
work on the project you
are proposing (because, in essence, you are). Don’t
make things up; it’s okay if you aren’t
qualified. Good things to list are
relevant classes,
research projects you’ve conducted in class or out of class, field
skills
you’ve gained through courses or summer programs, internships,
scholarships,
Wildlife Society or related club memberships, etc.
Don’t list the job you had at Hardee’s,
Dietrick’s, or Kroger unless you were a supervisor.
Entree level positions that aren’t relevant
to this position should not be included. Although
résumés are often a
requirement of grant application, the
reason I’m asking for this is to have you write a resume that you may
use later
if you haven’t already done so.