|
Table 1. Selected study streams and hydrodynamic,
chemical, and metabolic characteristics estimated from previous
measurements. 15N addition experiments have already been
conducted in Hugh White Creek, NC and in several Alaska streams
(denoted by *) and the results of these studies will also be used in
the intersite comparative analyses. |
||||||
Stream |
Biome |
Season of Study |
Hydrodynamics Q As:A |
Water Chemistry DIN N:P |
Detritus Chemistry C:N |
Metabolism GPP P:R |
Quebrada Bisley, PR |
Trop/Forest |
winter |
10 <0.2 |
250 220 |
high |
<200 <0.5 |
Sycamore Ck., AZ |
Temp/Arid |
spring |
10 >1 |
33 1.9 |
low |
8000 1.4 |
Gallina Ck., NM |
Temp/Semi-arid |
autumn |
5 >1 |
26 9 |
low |
400 0.5 |
S. Kings Ck., KA |
Temp/Praire |
spring |
5 0.2 |
20 <20 |
low |
600 4.9 |
Ball Ck., NC |
Temp/Forest |
autumn |
60 0.4 |
8 9.5 |
high |
<50 <0.2 |
Hugh White Ck., NC* |
Temp/Forest |
summer |
10 1.5 |
12 12 |
high |
<10 <0.1 |
Walker Br., TN |
Temp/Forest |
spring |
10 0.1 |
30 20 |
high |
300 0.4 |
Mack Ck., OR |
Temp/Forest |
summer |
70 <0.2 |
12 2 |
low |
600 1.4 |
Smith Ck., MI |
Temp/Forest |
summer |
40 >1 |
550 22 |
high |
100 0.2 |
Bear Br., NH |
Temp/Forest |
summer |
5 <0.2 |
420 940 |
high |
<10 <0.2 |
Kuparuk R. Trib., AK |
Tundra |
summer |
25 ? |
10 5 |
high |
? >1 |
Kuparuk R. (control), AK* |
Tundra |
summer |
1000 0.2 |
20 14 |
high |
? >1 |
Kuparuk R. (P fert.), AK* |
Tundra |
summer |
4000 0.2 |
9 3.5 |
high |
? >1 |
Blueberry Ck., AK* |
Tundra |
summer |
300 0.3 |
9 3.4 |
high |
? >1 |
Imnavait Ck., AK* |
Tundra |
summer |
100 ? |
8 7.6 |
high |
? >1 |
|
Units: Q (L/s), As:A (m2/m2), DIN (ugN/L), N:P (atomic, inorganic), GPP (mgO2/m2/d, P:R (atomic). Estimates of detritus C:N ratios are based on importance of algae (e.g. high GPP=low C:N) and dominant type of allocthonous input (e.g. tree leaves=high, peat=high, grasses=low). | ||||||